Reverse Repo Agreements

How does the desk communicate operating results? After a reverse-repo process, the desk publishes a summary of the results including the total amount, the total amount accepted and the premium rate. There are a number of differences between the two structures. A repo is technically a one-time transaction, while a sell/buy is a pair of transactions (a sale and a buy). The sale/redemption does not require specific legal documents, whereas a repo usually requires a framework contract between the buyer and the seller (usually the Global Master Repo Agreement (GMRA) ordered by SIFMA/ICMA). For this reason, an increase in risk compared to repo is associated. In the event of default by the counterparty, the absence of an agreement may reduce the legal position on the recovery of collateral. Any coupon payment on the underlying security during the term of the sale/redemption is generally returned to the purchaser of the security by adjusting the cash paid at the end of the sale/redemption. In a repo, the voucher is immediately sent to the security seller. In the Lehman Brothers case, rest was used as Tobashi schemes to temporarily mask significant losses due to intentional, half-closed time trades during the reference season.

This abuse of Repos is similar to Goldman Sachs` swaps in the « Greek Debt Mask »[20], which were used as a Tobashi scheme to legally circumvent the Maastricht Treaty`s deficit rules for active members of the European Union and allow Greece to « hide » more than €2.3 billion in debt. [21] Open does not have an end date set at closing. According to the contract, the duration is fixed either until the next working day and the repo is due unless a party extends it by a variable number of working days. Otherwise, it does not have a due date – but one or both parties have the option to terminate the transaction within a time agreed in advance. In a macro example for RSOs, the Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) uses rest and RSOs to ensure stability in credit markets through open market operations (OMO). The RRP operation is used less by the Fed than a repo, because a repo brings money to the banking system when it is short, while a CRR lends money to the system if there is too much liquidity. The Fed is putting in place RSOs to maintain monetary policy over the long term and ensure the liquidity of capital in the market. The term repo has given rise to many misunderstandings: there are two types of transactions with identical cash flows: the distinguishing feature of a tri-party repo is that a custodian bank or an international clearing organization, the tri-party agent, acts as an intermediary between the two parties to the repo. The tri-party agent is responsible for the management of the transaction, including the allocation of guarantees, labelling to the market and the substitution of guarantees. In the U.S., the two main tri-party agents are The Bank of New York Mellon and JP Morgan Chase, while in Europe, the main tri-party agents are Euroclear and Clearstream, six offering services in the Swiss market.

. . .